UK Veterans Slam Vance for “Disrespectful” Comments

The United Kingdom didn’t hold back.

After U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance made comments perceived as dismissive toward America’s allies, British military veterans and officials swiftly responded — and they didn’t mince words.

“Remember the 636”: Veterans Lead the Charge

British veterans, including high-profile figures like Johnny Mercer and Andy McNab, condemned Vance’s remarks. They pointed to the 636 British soldiers who lost their lives in Iraq and Afghanistan — a powerful reminder of the UK’s deep commitment to its alliance with the U.S.

“It’s not just about politics,” one veteran said. “It’s about respect.”

Military Leaders Weigh In

The backlash wasn’t limited to veterans. Former Royal Navy Admiral Lord West and General Sir Patrick Sanders, one of the UK’s most senior military officers, joined the chorus of criticism.

They emphasized the long-standing bond between UK and U.S. forces, forged in shared battles and sacrifices across the globe.

Politicians Across the Aisle Call for Respect

British political leaders from both parties echoed these concerns.

Shadow Defense Secretary James Cartlidge called Vance’s comments “deeply disrespectful,” reminding the world of Britain’s substantial military contributions in recent conflicts.

Even former Foreign Secretary James Cleverly and other senior Members of Parliament weighed in, urging Vance to acknowledge the shared history between the two nations.

Starmer Defends UK Troops

Prime Minister Keir Starmer also responded, praising the bravery and service of British troops.

“Our nation is proud of its military history,” Starmer said. “Mutual respect between allies isn’t optional — it’s essential.”

Vance Responds — But Controversy Persists

Facing mounting criticism, Vice President Vance tried to clarify his comments. He claimed he wasn’t targeting the UK or France specifically, but was referring to nations with limited recent combat experience.

Still, many in the UK aren’t buying it.

A Lesson in Diplomacy?

The controversy has sparked a broader debate: How should global leaders talk about their allies? In an increasingly interconnected world, diplomatic sensitivity is more important than ever — especially when speaking about those who’ve bled beside you on the battlefield.